Incident Details

Edit
Serious
⚠️ Potentially Fatal
Takeoff

Parachutal stall/spin during takeoff, rapid ground impact from 10m

Pilot performed forward launch with Paramania Action 29. After becoming airborne at ~10m altitude, noticed poor climb rate and slight left drift, applied slight right brake correction. Suddenly experienced rapid height loss despite full power. Wing rotated 90 degrees then additional 180 degrees before full-throttle impact with ground. Pilot survived with injuries, paramotor destroyed.

Incident Details

Wrong control input

High — very likely identified

Pilot laid out glider and checked lines. Started engine remotely and walked it to attachment points. Performed forward launch in slight breeze. Glider inflated normally, pilot applied power at 60 degrees. Launch run and initial climb appeared normal but climb rate was poor. Pilot remained in hang position planning to transition to seated once higher. Noticed slight left drift and applied slight right brake pressure to correct. At approximately 10 meters altitude, suddenly experienced rapid loss of height despite full engine power. Within split second, pilot was driven hard into ground facing uphill while still in hang position. Witness (Jeff S.) observed wing was at 90 degrees to pilot just before crash, with pilot rotating clockwise from above, followed by further 180 degree rotation before ground impact at full power.

Analysis suggests parachutal stall where fully inflated wing stopped flying forward and descended nearly vertically, possibly transitioning into spin. Contributing factors: pilot applied right brake (opposite of normal torque compensation) to correct left drift, which may have aggravated the situation. Pilot had modified riser attachment point by 50mm instead of trim adjustment to compensate for strong right torque effect of Action wing. Low altitude (10m) left no time for recovery. Normal reaction would be hands up, reduce power, but incident happened too quickly.

Not deployed

ground, uphill terrain

Wrong input triggered incident

Date & Location

January 1, 2006

Equipment

Footlaunch

SOLO 210

Paramania

Action

29

Pilot & Flight

10 m

Experienced pilot who had previously flown different wing. Had modified right riser attachment point by 50mm to compensate for torque effect instead of using trim adjustment.

Collapse Sequence

1.Full stall

Contributing Factors

Partially open

Not used

Low flight altitude

Pilot-Related Factors

Wrongly adjusted trims
Wrong throttle management

Weather Conditions

slight breeze

Links & Media

Return to the incident list: Incident List Wing Malfunction or Deflation PPG Type: Type of Injury: Pilot Details Age: 0 Weight: 0 Gender: Highest rating held at the time of the incident: Pilot experience level: Gear Details Wing Brand: Model: Paramania Action 29, no speedbar fitted, trim setting for T/O at 30% Size: Paramotor Frame: Paramotor, SOLO 210, prop 120 cm dia, thrust maybe about 50 kg with Incident Details January 1, 2006 Location of the incident: , Type of Incident: I was at the T/O area with Jeff S, who launched first off, doing a reverse launch and had a text book launch. I decided to do a forward launch as there was only a slight breeze and all condiions seemed to be ok for a standard forward launch. Layed out glider and checked all lines, pulled out brake lines to the sides as per my normal procedure. Started engine remote from glider and walked running engine to attachment points where I hooked in the glider. Checked my central position by tugging on A risers. Pulled up glider. Glider came up as usual, no problem, at 60 degrees I revved the engine to assist with launch. Glider came up further and I proceeded with the launch run. Glider showed normal lift during T/O. When airborne I noticed that the climbout rate was not good and I recalled that the Action wing needs to build up speed in order to climb out. As there were no obstacles I did not pull the brakes to increase lift and let the glider fly itself. I noticed a slight drift to the left and slightly corrected this by increasing pressure on the right brake. By now I am around 10 meters up and still in hang position as I prefer to go to a sitting position when I am well up from the ground. Suddenly, for a brief moment I noticed that I was loosing height rapidly even with full revs on the engine and within a split second I was hard driven into the ground facing uphill. Jeff S was at that time flying behind me and watched the event, according to him the glider was, just before the crash, at 90 degrees with the pilot, the pilot turning clockwise from above, this was rapidly followed by a further turn to 180 degrees followed by a full rev smash into the ground. Damage: I walked away from the crash site, although slowly and hurt. Paramotor is a total disaster, main impact side is at the pilots left side Jeff and I have tried to explain the events, without success and have not been able to pinpoint a cause Any suggestions welcome. Supplemental info, the pilot answered questions: Was the wing vertically above your head all the time? “yes, according to the feel on the risers...did not have the time to look up)” So your pressure on the right brake was opposite to the brake required for torque compensation – Was it light pressure? “that is correct” Please explain your torque compensation arrangement again. Do you normally need any left or right brake during climbout? “before jumping to conclusions, I have to mention here that I have found with the Action wing that there is a strong torque effect to the right, this compared to my old wing. some pilots have a pulled in trim on the left riser to combat this, I have, some time ago, increased the height of the right riser attachment point instead of changing the trim, this stopped the torque effect, the height adjustment is 50 mm or 2 inches)” So Jeff’s description is that the wing was initially yawed 90deg to the left, then yawed a further 180deg. Or was it you that was yawed 90deg initially, then turned a further 180? “I felt that the wing was yawing to the left and compensated with a slight pull on the right brake...this, I think corrected the yaw to the left followed by a loss of climb and a fast rotation of the pilot under the wing” Do you believe that the crumple zone effect of the cage collapsing saved you from major injury? “Yes, as I landed on my side, I have to admit that the cage and prop absorbed a large amount of energy, the cage is a writeoff, not me.” Ed: One likely scenario is an element of parachutal stall where a fully inflated wing stops flying forward and descends nearly vertical. The normal reaction to suspected parachutal condition is hands up, reduce power. The turning suggests a spin – the reaction to a spin is the same: hands up, reduce power. In both cases be prepared to brake the surging wing when it recovers into forward flight. Flight Window: Wind Speed: Type: Phase of Flight: Type of Injury: Collateral Damage: Analysis of the incident (additional input by the incident investigation team): Photos (if available): Video (if available): Other Files (if available): Return to the incident list: Incident List

© 2025 PPG IncidentsMIT LicenseView on GitHubHelp Contribute